Trace a chain of title
Follow a registration backwards through the prior documents it cites, hop by hop, and stop where the register does: at an unregistered link, a document it will not return, or the earliest deed it holds.
Karnataka · Delhi · Tamil Nadu
Rotom pulls encumbrance history, registered deeds and title chains straight from the state registers, then checks them against the report you were handed. Every finding points back at the record it came from.
Open registration — no invite code and no email confirmation.
Trace the title on Survey 110/2A and check it against the scrutiny report we were sent.
The chain holds back to the 2014 sale deed. One discrepancy: the 2018 gift deed the scrutiny report relies on is not on the register against this survey number.
Every other field — parties, extent, consideration — matches.
What it does
Follow a registration backwards through the prior documents it cites, hop by hop, and stop where the register does: at an unregistered link, a document it will not return, or the earliest deed it holds.
Every registration recorded against a survey number or property number over a date range you choose, addressed by registration village or revenue village, with parties, extents and considerations as the register states them.
Take the scrutiny report or draft deed you were sent and compare it field by field: parties, dates, consideration, schedule. You get what matched, what did not, and what the register simply does not hold.
Karnataka's Kaveri, Delhi's DORIS and Tamil Nadu's TNREGINET each have their own hierarchy, session handling and captcha. Rotom absorbs all three so a request is phrased in place names, not portal codes.
How it works
A survey number and a village, a registration number, or the report you were handed. No district codes, no office ids: the agent resolves the hierarchy itself and asks when a locality could be two places.
Every portal call, its arguments and its result appear as they happen. A retrieval that takes an hour is a durable run, not a request, so you can close the tab and come back to it.
Findings cite the registration they came from. Where the register is silent, it says so in those words rather than filling the gap with an inference.
Working with it
A finding names the document, office and year it rests on. Nothing is summarised away, and the raw result of each call stays in the transcript.
Steps that cost money or commit to a course of action pause and wait for your approval. The run holds until you answer; it does not time out into a guess.
The whole transcript is stored, in order, tied to your account. Come back a month later and the working is still there to hand to a reviewer.
What this is not. An informational search is not a signed encumbrance certificate, and a portal returning no records is not proof of clear title, present ownership, or the absence of an unregistered charge. Rotom reports what the register holds and says plainly where it is silent.
Create an account, describe one property, and judge Rotom on a matter you already know the answer to.